I was re-reading that Intellectual’s Masterpiece on
Spirituality, “Varieties of Religious Experience”, by William James, who had
been a Harvard Professor at the turn of the 20th Century; one should
read such a classic every 40 years or so just to stay current, anyway, I
developed a few fresh insights that I think evaded me on my last read through.
Firstly, subjective Religious/Spiritual Enlightenment
Experiences are presented by the Mind, if I may be permitted to explain the
phenomena materialistically, in order to resolve serious or even potentially life
threatening Nervous or Emotional Breakdowns.
These occur when the involved individuals have struck ‘rock bottom’, so
to speak, and turn desperately to “a higher power”. This accounts for such a high number of very
sincere Religious Conversions among reformed drunks and, since the Eighties,
former cocaine addicts. But it is not
entirely necessary to get to the depths of despair simply through an excess of
bad habits, which destroy the health, finances and all of one’s important
social and family supports; no, one can also reach the bottoms of despair by
being, well, neurotically Ideal enough to experience a Crisis of Meaning of
Life, that is, to see all the ordinary events and happenings of Life as petty,
shallow or even kind of dirty, and then to be appalled by anything that that
seems predatory or hurtful, and it all becomes so much worse when such
Individuals see all such behaviors as having impulses within their own
Selves. It presents a crisis of Value,
where one wonders where the strength to continue such a miserable and even negative
existence should come from, when all reasonable or compelling arguments would
favor either an active suicide, or to simply allow oneself to wither away… or
to drown one’s sorrows in drink, or reach for the artificial Exaltation of the
Cocaine Experience… but this is putting us in a circle.
It can’t be understated how thorough such Religious/Spiritual
Resolutions to these Nervous or Emotional Breakdowns are – the Subjective
Certainty that one has been rescued and is now and forever under the Protection
and Care of an All Powerful, or All Important Higher Power is unshakable. These people do from the depths of despair to
the Olympian summits of absolute Delight… one can hardly help to envy such wonderful
experiences going to drunks and those low-life sleaze-ball cokeheads, but that
is simply how the Psychological Math of such Metaphysical Geometries tend to
work out. Higher Resolution Events
occur to those in Crisis. If one is living
well, or even just managing to cope, then, well, if there is no Real Problem,
then there is required no very important Solution.
The sad thing about reading “Varieties of Religious
Experience”, if one is a dedicated Religious Spiritualist, is that the background
Materialism of it all is rather compelling, and that we find that while the core
Experiences and and the basic shape of the Effects have a certain uniformity,
the actual Details involved can cover a frightful range of Beliefs and subsequent
Life Style Choices. I was able to come
to some understanding of this when I read Saint Teresa of Avila’s “Interior
Castle”, a real Spiritual Classic, which presents Spiritual Enlightenment more
in terms of Process then I have so far seen in William James, that while the initial
‘Conversion Experience’ may be exactly as powerful as mentioned above, still,
the Person who receives such an Experience certainly hungers for more, for
Repeat Performances. The Initial Glow of
the Conversion Experience recedes and Life becomes dull again, and so my guess
is that the Convert gets a bit Superstitious and Obsessive about recreating the
original conditions of the First Conversion Experience. The Drunk may relapse simply to get back into
Crisis Mode (which makes a lot of sense when one listens to more than a few Alcoholics
Anonymous speeches, and how there is almost a positive pride in recounting how
many times they have “fallen off the wagon” only to re-achieve their
victories), and the Religious Fanatic goes back to more and more severe
fasting, mortifications of the flesh, and renunciations of any of Life’s small
pleasures, all in order to re-establish that Crisis Level of Despair that would
Trigger the Intervention of God. Again,
we need to remind ourselves that in many such cases, these behaviors can
actually be life threatening. With the
Drunks this is easy enough to intuit, but with the Religious Fanatic we must
imagine how the fasting and depravations can slowly be escalated until the
Health is run down to such a frail degree that it finally just snaps. At this point one can’t help but to have
something of a mixed appraisal of Spiritual Aspirations, where the Proven and
Demonstrated Paths to Enlightenment seem to straddle the fence just on the edge
of effective Suicide.
But then I remembered good old Swami Ramakrishna whose
approach seemed to emphasize more of the Positive, and if I can put it into
terms which we have now established, that the ‘crisis’ can be one of Unfulfilled
Divine Love, that is, a kind of Higher Pining Away. Where the Monastic Catholic focusses on his
own Dispair at being a Low and Unworthy Worm, trapped in a Body prone to Sin,
which does in fact create something of an effective Emotional Crisis, one such
as Swami Ramakrishna looks more at the Greatness of God then at any exaggerated
view of his own Inferiority. It comes
out seeming happier overall.
Yes, Ramakrishna too was a ‘Chain Experiencer’, seeking for
repetitions of this Peak Experience, but he would achieve his ends through,
well, serial ‘Love Affairs’ with various Names, Forms and Aspects of God; and
in India, there are plenty to choose from.
Not that Ramakrishna did not also have his ‘Superstitions’ – he could
rant about ‘Women and Money’ as even the strictest Saint Francis, but at the
end of the day, he had a woman doing his cooking and cleaning, and, well, he lived
in Bombay and his rent money was coming from somewhere and wasn’t being tossed
away. It all seemed like his more
positive Fanaticism was easier to moderate then the Negative Crisis Mode which
really does seem to require Monastic Supervision for it not to be entirely too
self-destructive.
Oh, the good news, from Saint Teresa of Avila is that the
Repetitions of Crisis can eventually result in a Permanent Union with the
Divine. When Teresa arrived at this
point herself, she became a bit more practical regarding the risks of extreme
fasting and mortifications of the flesh, not wishing her subordinate nuns to go
overboard in such practices, but still, it was unavoidable that she would still
see the Path that worked for herself was indeed a viable and even exemplary
Path. Her emphasis was to see God as
the Highest and Humanity as the Lowest, and such tension would bring on an
inevitable Spiritual Crisis and God would inevitably come to the rescue.
Ramakrishna’s Methodology, while seeming more wholesome,
lighter and brighter, well, suffers from practical problems concerning
execution, that is, how one is supposed to Love a God that is primarily an
abstraction, that is, an Abstraction for one that has not had the God
Experience yet. It is all quite like
falling in love with a girl that one has never met. One may very strongly wish to fall in love,
but that is not nearly the same thing as finally catching the eye of a girl we actually
‘do’ fall in love with. Here, I think the feeling of Emptiness would
come into play, as opposed to the Catholic focus on Human Inferiority and
Worthlessness. But here the problem
arises with the natural tendency for Humans to ‘cope’ with their problems. One can learn to ‘cope’ with the feeling of
Emptiness by, well, resorting to the pleasures of “money and women”, where the
Catholic Methodologies are structurally better suited to forestall any attempts
for their Spiritual Aspirants to ‘cope’ with their impending crisis conditions.
Oh, back to William James and “Varieties of Religious
Experience”. It seems that back in his
day, just over a hundred years ago, the New Age Movement was just beginning to
get on its feet – he refers to it as the “Mind Heal Movement”, which he sees as
a happy, optimistic and positive Movement for people who are basically happy,
optimistic and positive already, and that all of its methods and aims are
toward what we would see in our larger view as ‘coping’ mechanisms that do not
lead to Spiritual Crisis, but rather forestall any possible chance of at a real
Higher Integration of the Personality.
So it is that the New Age avoids Moral Conflicts and Crisis, and tells
us to simply feel good about ourselves. To
Experience God we only need to understand God is in and around us already… and
so there is nothing really wrong with Child Labor to make us our cool leisure
shoes or paying our maidsfrom Central America less than minimum wage because they
are ‘illegal’ and can go nowhere to complain. When everything is already so Great, why would
one ever want to have a Spiritual Crisis?
So the New Age comes off seeing the Old Styles of Religion and
Spirituality as largely Negative, but the Religions bulk at the New Age
Movement’s amoralism, inherent hedonism, naiveté and moral and intellectual shallowness.
Of course the New Age is not really new. One can look at many Ancient Philosophical Systems
and what even passes for Ancient Religion and see what are plainly just ‘Coping
Mechanisms’ – ideas for accepting Life just as it is found. I would site examples, but people are so
easily offended, and so I would rather people arrive at these truths under
their own steam, so to speak.
No comments:
Post a Comment